Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 15:28
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 270
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 922
86% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,315
81% 1,315 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 202
Parallax 235
166% 213 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 214
Splatting 155
168% 213 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 154%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 930 656 845 971 399 272 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,328
Write 1,011
Mixed 920
SusWrite 679
220% 984 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.4
259% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 323
349% 585 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 207%
Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
279GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 206 155 125 101 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 487
Write 456
Mixed 194
SusWrite 187
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 32.4
102% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 136
125% 197 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
102GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 150 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 104
Write 79
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 152
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 72 94 94 91 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 66.3
Write 96.5
Mixed 74
SusWrite 90.3
61% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
168% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 66%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
122GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 85 85 86 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 73.5
Write 79
Mixed 66
SusWrite 82.8
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 67%
Generic- SD Card 32GB
6GB free, PID 0306
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 92.5
Write 20.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 20.7
44% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.1
293% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 29
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 26.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback