bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WB
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 02:07
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 151
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 349
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 37.9
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 39
Splatting 31.8
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 87 62 53 61 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 220
Write 211
Mixed 176
SusWrite 76.6
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 14.1
73% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 31.6
30% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 82%
WD WD5000YS-18MPB1 500GB
166GB free
Firmware: 09.02E09
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 53.2
Write 48.8
Mixed 35.5
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353437312D3035322E4130304C4620 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.7% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback