Asus M3N-H/HDMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M3N-H/HDMI (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100927
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '20 at 21:50
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom X3 8650 1,447 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.75 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 74.8 39% 59.2 Pts	4-Core 99.8 8-Core 105 14% 102 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 82F1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.37 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST340014AS 40Y8750LEN 40GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.46 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 45.3 Write 43.2 Mixed 29.8 29% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 32%
Hitachi HTS721060G9SA00 60GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2GB free Firmware: MC3OC10H SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 20.4 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 20.4 17% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 22%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46 4,039 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 7GB free Firmware: P22OAB3A SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 50 48 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 70.1 Write 39.3 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 50.4 37% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 39%
Seagate ST340810A 40GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 3GB free Firmware: 3.34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 25 25 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 24.2 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 25.4 16% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 16%
Seagate ST3500418AS 328GB 2GB free Firmware: CC49 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 78.7 Write 75.3 Mixed 47.6 50% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.57 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3N-H/HDMI Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N-H/HDMI

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	1x
Phenom 9850AMDBench 46%, 2,080 samples	1x
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16