Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 21:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 158
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 228
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Legend(17AA 3978) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 20.9
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 395 395 438 453 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 454
Mixed 438
SusWrite 409
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 48.2
159% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 275
230% 332 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback