Packard EasyNote TE69KB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote TE69KB  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TE69KB
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131022
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 17:07
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 46.8
27% 39.6 Pts
4-Core 90.2
8-Core 92.8
12% 91.5 Pts
64-Core 93.5
6% 93.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Acer(1025 076F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 1.7
1% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LT012-9WS14 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 54 46 66 88 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 68.4
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TE69KB Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE69KB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback