MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 13:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 62.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
78% 147 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 992
88% 744 Pts
64-Core 2,658
164% 2,658 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 348
Mixed 117
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 22.1
76% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 98.7
88% 138 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 182 172 180 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 190
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 178
115% 159 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
342% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 51.4
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 51.1
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 128%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback