Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '17 at 04:02
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 73.7 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 970 86% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,333 82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1408 MHz, MLim: 1790 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 72.6 Parallax 90.4 54% 76.5 fps	MRender 62.4 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 58.2 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 124 100 636 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1119 (A6) Unknown 100 100 392 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 443 (A9) Unknown 100 100 11 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 423 (AE) Unknown 100 100 338 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 100 249108103208 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 14 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 45049 (F1) Unknown 253 253 12875 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7232	59% Above average	Read 510 Write 203 Mixed 289 73% 334 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 3.77 88% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.7 DQ Write 80.1 DQ Mixed 3.63 17% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 78%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 511GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 135 2591 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2301 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2410 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1016 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 317 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1983 (C2) HDA temperature 115 90 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	69.1% Good	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 119 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.27 112% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 85%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB 4,539 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 350GB free Firmware: GJ002C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2085 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4752 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 6759 (0A) Spinup retry count 194 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3695 (B7) Unknown 100 100 15 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BC) Unknown 100 95 247 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 33 589168673 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 145 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8978569 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 26987 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2	45.1% Average	Read 74 Write 83.1 Mixed 75.1 58% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.31 80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 48%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 55GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1240 (03) Spinup time 186 174 1691 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1277 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2723 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1116 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 357 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 919 (C2) HDA temperature 115 92 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.4% Very good	Read 146 Write 120 Mixed 114 95% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.19 86% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67 46,617 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (93^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.1% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 27.2 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 22.8 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)