Alphasync 1128519

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlphasync 1128519  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 20:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 216
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 639
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 38.9
34% 37.8 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 37.4
32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 480GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STKSC010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 361 189 104 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 458
Write 222
Mixed 336
SusWrite 188
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 38.1
146% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 200
171% 250 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
861GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 183 197 197 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 155
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 189
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 24.3
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 22.3
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1128519 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Alphasync 1128519

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback