Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171130
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '20 at 18:58
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	97%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$169 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 186 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 375 40% 318 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 0 Parallax 15.8 34% 19 fps	MRender 30.9 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 14.4 24% 31.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 139 121 120 141 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 207 Write 201 Mixed 211 SusWrite 130 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 16.3 60% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 153 134% 198 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 54GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 137 133 142 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 102 Write 111 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 136 70% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 19.9 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	492x
Core i5-7600KIntel $169Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	113x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	81x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	122x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	93x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	83x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	35x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	43x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	33x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $765

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16