Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 11:51
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 136
61% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 427
40% 332 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 977 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 74.5
53% 65.3 fps
MRender 57.4
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 74.4
52% 61.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,218
Write 2,247
Mixed 2,296
573% 2,587 MB/s
4K Read 212
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 80.7
467% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 382
280% 368 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
2TB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 52 47 51 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 40
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 50.5
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
658GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 97 103 95 101 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 91.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 99.5
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-115.A00LF F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 9905403-115.A00LF F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 12GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback