Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191011
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '20 at 06:48
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 187 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 351 41% 320 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 36.1 35% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 38 Splatting 34.9 30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 35 100 41 76 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 316 Write 81.5 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 81.6 29% 135 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 10.3 48% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 16.6 14% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 251GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 127 128 126 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 133 Write 133 Mixed 76 SusWrite 126 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-082.B00G 2x8GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 19.1 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,875x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	868x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	193x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	462x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	397x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	358x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	513x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	239x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	201x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	500x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	166x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	117x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16