Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 45.7 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 88.7 35% 59.5 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 175 24% 175 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2067) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.97 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.71 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.04 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 60GB 60GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0630A SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 26 25 27 29 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 366 Write 190 Mixed 139 SusWrite 31.3 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 8.7 73% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 22.6 45% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 177 22% 177 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,050x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16