MSI MS-16P7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL63 9SDK
MotherboardMSI MS-16P7  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190702
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 18:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 808
81% 657 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 126A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.9% Good
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 59.2
63% 71.3 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 73.7
68% 84.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 464 508 453 469 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 592
Write 762
Mixed 600
SusWrite 470
137% 606 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 41.7
134% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 540
482% 731 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 131%
Great: 148%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
732GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 305 271 87 97 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 437
Write 373
Mixed 294
SusWrite 199
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 13
63% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 28.3
41% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 21.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 26.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P7 Builds (Compare 1,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback