Asus Z77-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z77-A  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 16:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 472
63% 470 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 74.8
45% 63.8 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 57.5
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 78 114 84 107 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 239
Write 87.4
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 106
28% 130 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 10.5
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
132GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 88.2
Write 91
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 121
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ERS303A 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77-A Builds (Compare 495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z77-A - $144

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $576
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback