Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Memory 20.7 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 46.8 18% 30.8 Pts	4-Core 46.9 8-Core 47.8 6% 47.3 Pts	64-Core 47.4 3% 47.4 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HS-SSD-C100 120GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 158 128 125 93 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 452 Write 377 Mixed 370 SusWrite 164 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 21 86% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 92.1 DQ Mixed 42.1 47% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GB 5,684 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	15% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 4.7 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 315 13% 315 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	185x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	23x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	208x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	4x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S 1x4GBAdataBench 22%, 928 samples	96x
HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 16%, 5,684 samples	55x
HP16D3LS1KEGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 17%, 468 samples	17x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16