HP 700-074

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-074  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130919
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 09:00
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 342
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84C4) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 18
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.3
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 499 500 506 503 502 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 201 202 203 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 161
Mixed 84
SusWrite 201
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 117%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 1.5TB
259GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 75.1
Mixed 46
SusWrite 77.3
92% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-074 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-074

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback