Asus X750JB

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus X750JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X750JB
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130814
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 02 '17 at 16:47
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 100 2-Core 186 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 327 37% 290 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M 15,605 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 122D) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8189 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	5.04% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 7.38 Parallax 6.78 5% 6.8 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 5.33 Splatting 7.57 5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.04% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 480GB-$400 512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 317GB free Firmware: M311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4936 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2232 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 0 68723736606 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 20198 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9278 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9260 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 21320	51.1% Above average	Read 504 Write 348 Mixed 401 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.75 36% 8.24 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 102%
OCZ INTREPID 3800 200GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.4.7.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3156 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 912 (64) Unknown 100 100 58444640 (AB) Unknown 88 0 2935 (AE) Unknown 15 100 141 (B8) Unknown 11 100 393 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 86 63 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3560 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5052 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 949987304 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 100 100 10000 (CE) Flying height 0 100 0 (CF) Spin high current 44 100 1331 (D0) Spin buzz 28 100 863 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (D3) Unknown 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 66264 (D5) Unknown 100 100 36522 (D6) Unknown 100 100 29742 (DD) G-sense error rate 100 100 2873944 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 1 100 1 (E9) Unknown 92 0 92 (F9) Unknown 100 100 79734 (FB) Unknown 100 100 12362	88.8% Excellent	Read 366 Write 392 Mixed 369 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 32.2 136% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 90.5 100% 166 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB 9,208 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	57.7% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X750JB Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X750JB

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	120x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	88x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	34x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	30x
ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,492 samples	15x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 63 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16