Lenovo 4158CL9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4158CL9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory10.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5570-$70
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 167
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 396
46% 359 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.1% Good
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 75.2
62% 76.4 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 72.9
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 233 235 235 234 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
75.7% Very good
Read 245
Write 242
Mixed 235
SusWrite 235
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 42.2
137% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 195
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 3x4GB
3 of 12 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 21.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4158CL9 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4158CL9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback