Asrock Z370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170830
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 12:28
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 241
76% 142 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 713
75% 600 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 67.2
63% 73.9 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 72
59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 255 150 152 152 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 440
Write 450
Mixed 331
SusWrite 203
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 23.4
119% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 113
94% 134 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 174 173 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 172
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 171
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 7.8 7.2 7.6 7 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
9.1% Terrible
Read 38.1
Write 7.2
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 7.1
19% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 2.4
109% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Pro4 - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback