MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 00:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 86.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 925
95% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBA3V5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 425 428 428 428 428 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,592
Write 1,627
Mixed 1,292
SusWrite 491
280% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 83.2
298% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,261
DQ Write 1,121
DQ Mixed 1,002
803% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 238%
Great: 239%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
415GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 126 124 124 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 134
Write 131
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 125
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 3.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.9
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.5
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback