Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 00:28
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 282
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 844
83% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 97.3
Parallax 104
86% 103 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 86.3
Splatting 70.5
74% 94.2 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,408
Write 2,608
Mixed 1,655
427% 1,890 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 80.9
270% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 1,232
917% 1,214 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 310%
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
37GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 128 128 147 97 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 483
Write 418
Mixed 376
SusWrite 146
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 26.9
90% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 156
131% 189 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 90%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
25GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,795
Write 992
Mixed 1,063
283% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 61.1
232% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 430
382% 576 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 230%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 195 195 195 196 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 173
Mixed 30
SusWrite 195
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
362% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 33.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 33.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback