Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140425
Uptime	10.7 Days
Run Date	May 01 '17 at 23:00
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88 21,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 133 59% 96.4 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 238 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 67.2 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 89.9 55% 72.7 fps	MRender 60.6 Gravity 59.5 Splatting 78.7 56% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13538 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 214 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 94 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13405241541	81.8% Excellent	Read 475 Write 378 Mixed 401 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 20.1 114% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 19.2 47% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 124%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 6GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 114 89263891 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 -107812269023311 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 471 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 510 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 89263891 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 89263891 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 89263891 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12444 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5761 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5761 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13465	51.9% Above average	Read 439 Write 79.8 Mixed 127 46% 215 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 11.4 89% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 96.8 DQ Write 77 DQ Mixed 11.3 29% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 28.9 Mixed 29.6 38% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.08 42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GBH1X04F1AA28-15 4GBH1X04F1AA28-15 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 12GB 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 10.9 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16