Pcchips A15G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPcchips A15G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCCHIPS A15G
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 22:55
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 49.3
29% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 131
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570
Dell(1028 2121) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 10.7
0% 6.69 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 7.97
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.25 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 95.5
Write 21.9
Mixed 6
9% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 82%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB
68GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.8
Write 34.2
Mixed 26.2
24% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 31%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
7GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 8.4
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 11.8
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.7
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A15G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pcchips A15G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback