Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 224 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 557 59% 472 Pts	64-Core 637 39% 637 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 149 129 132 126 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 485 Write 386 Mixed 246 SusWrite 170 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 25.8 107% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 208 148% 190 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 99%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 318GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 105 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 124 Write 98.6 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 104 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 11.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	667x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	528x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	200x

SSD
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GBBench 86%, 6,231 samples	182x
MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,504 samples	155x
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	130x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	340x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	302x
RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 1x16GBRamaxelBench 43%, 3,986 samples	192x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16