Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 134 52% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 166 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1413) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.62% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.62% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2BW120G3H 240GB 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 168 117 99 85 83 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 217 Write 207 Mixed 182 SusWrite 125 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 12.7 53% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 127 104% 147 MB/s

USB DISK Pro 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 5423 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.8 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 14.7 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4.7 14% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 24% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.3 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4350ATIBench 1%, 1,871 samples	51x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	32x
Radeon HD 6300MAMDBench 1%, 2,918 samples	19x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16