HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory16.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 15:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3223
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 251
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 875
80% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 27
27% 27.7 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 33
25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 225 214 210 203 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 412
Mixed 402
SusWrite 235
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 43.5
151% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 129%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
841GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 38
Write 40.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 41.4
54% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 23.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback