PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z6 G4 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 81C6 |
Memory | 16.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201028 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 18 '20 at 15:28 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W-3223
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
79.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 225 214 210 203 195 MB/s
|
94.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
841GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 41 41 41 MB/s
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon Silver 4114IntelBench 65%, 539 samples | 61x |
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples | 61x |
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41081stBench 59%, 156 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples | 92x |
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples | 48x |
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |