Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 06:47
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,047
99% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,445
89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 5510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 134
Parallax 134
112% 135 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 129
Splatting 106
108% 136 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c19 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 751 736 792 800 662 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 779
Mixed 765
SusWrite 637
198% 891 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 53.8
200% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 454
336% 437 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 175%
Great: 244%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$58
370GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1540 872 887 885 886 884 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,613
Write 1,259
Mixed 1,522
SusWrite 992
354% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 92.9
318% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,432
DQ Write 1,226
DQ Mixed 513
607% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 323%
Great: 372%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
170GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 165 165 133 167 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 172
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 164
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
257GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 87.8
Mixed 54
SusWrite 84.6
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51%
Great: 88%
Generic External 400GB
36GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 26.5
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 38.6
44% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 21%
Apacer Portable HDD 1TB
179GB free, PID c004
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 134 134 134 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 59.8
Write 110
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 133
138% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 30.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback