MSI MS-16FK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GX60 1AC
MotherboardMSI MS-16FK  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '17 at 23:21
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 83.5
47% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 144
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
MSI(1462 10DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 6.16
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 7.74
5% 5.94 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU900 512GB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1026A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 491
Write 430
Mixed 476
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 1.22
46% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 1.17
9% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HG4N-DI M2S4G64CB8HG4N-DI 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.2
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16FK Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback