ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL702VM

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus GL702VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161006
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '17 at 22:50
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 545 54% 444 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 369.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 72.4 Parallax 60.6 52% 65.8 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 60.3 Splatting 67 53% 64.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30100P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 384 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 197 (64) Unknown 100 100 2275395 (A8) Unknown 100 99 8 (A9) Unknown 91 91 99 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 97 97 33 (B2) Unknown 100 100 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 199 (B4) Unknown 100 100 5241 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 41 0 73017851945 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 98 1 369 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 9097 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1772 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2579 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 693139	74.3% Very good	Read 514 Write 247 Mixed 327 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 15.2 92% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 14.9 78% 181 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 867GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 129 129 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 398 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 245 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 81 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7352 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 176094642205 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	72.3% Very good	Read 124 Write 127 Mixed 134 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.18 78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB 32,056 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	416x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	443x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	93x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	43x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	19x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	146x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	32x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback