Acer Aspire 5552G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 5552G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE51_DN
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '17 at 22:44
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II N970 Quad-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 63.5
38% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 132
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Acer(1025 0489) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.31
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 5.52
4% 5.39 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 68.6
Mixed 64.1
49% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.21
44% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5552G Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5552G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback