Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 18:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 183
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 685
64% 533 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 456.55
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 55
Parallax 44.5
39% 49 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 61.7
48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 314 266 283 134 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 413
Mixed 344
SusWrite 258
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 45.8
147% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 41.8
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 20.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99M-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback