Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Toshiba Satellite A100 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel CAPELL VALLEY(NAPA) CRB
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20070712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '20 at 15:39
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7400-$110 673 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 31 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 44.5 21% 33.1 Pts	4-Core 45 8-Core 45.7 6% 45.3 Pts	64-Core 45.5 3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7600 397 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 FF10) 256MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7948 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 0.69 Parallax 0.06 1% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 88 101 101 101 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.2% Below average	Read 98.4 Write 101 Mixed 97.9 SusWrite 96.2 22% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 23.1 72% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 44.3 DQ Mixed 32.5 26% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 115%
Generic SD32G SD Card 32GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 17GB free Firmware: 3.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 9.2 9.4 9.8 9.6 9.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	5.53% Terrible	Read 8.3 Write 6 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 9.3 6% 7.48 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.1 325% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.53% Great: 26%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 69GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 42 37 47 38 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 73.1 Write 47.4 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 42.6 67% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.1 118% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 249 16% 249 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce Go 7300NvidiaBench 0%, 116 samples	4x
GeForce Go 7600NvidiaBench 0%, 397 samples	3x
Mobility Radeon X1400ATIBench 0%, 468 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	6x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $55

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16