MSI MS-B090

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-B09012
MotherboardMSI MS-B090  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 15:03
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$66
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 392
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 38
Parallax 30.9
27% 34 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 42.7
34% 40.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-512S3C 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 215 215 217 218 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 458
Mixed 366
SusWrite 231
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 48.4
166% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 257
214% 310 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C13S4/8G KHX2400C14S4/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 20.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-B090 Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-B090

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback