Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 06:12
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 588
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 680 630 640 599 563 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 930
Write 916
Mixed 718
SusWrite 624
179% 797 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 58.7
191% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 636
479% 639 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 163%
Great: 313%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 368 355 340 346 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 154
Write 56.1
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 358
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 1.6
8% 3.63 MB/s
DQ Read 7
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 6.7
6% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 541%
HEMA_64G HEMA_64GB 64GB
27GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 27 28 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 19.2
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 26.8
39% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.5
160% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 39%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
21GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 19 19 17 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 155
Write 31.3
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 18.2
51% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0
62% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
56GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 18 22 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 159
Write 29.1
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 20.2
51% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Mixed 0
41% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M391B5173QH0-YK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M391B5173QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $203
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback