RM DESKTOP 300

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	RM DESKTOP 300 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ57TM
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '20 at 18:48
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 163 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 361 41% 319 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Lighting 47.8 Reflection 33.5 Parallax 40.4 39% 40.5 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 45 Splatting 39.8 34% 41 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ SOLID3 120GB 1,720 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 102 98 100 100 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 130 Write 114 Mixed 114 SusWrite 95.9 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 22.5 78% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 63.9 DQ Mixed 26.3 25% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 61%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 96 107 108 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 119 Write 105 Mixed 61 SusWrite 99.7 70% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.M16F CT51264BA1339.M16F HYCC5504G-DR CT51264BA1339.M16F 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.5% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 13.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DESKTOP 300 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: RM DESKTOP 300

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	12x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	6x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
hynix SH920 2.5 128GBSKBench 73%, 854 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
KVT8FP-HYC KVT8FP-HYC HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 20GBKingstonBench 34%, 3 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336