TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 14:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 938
85% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,355
84% 1,355 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 85.9%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1660 MHz, MLim: 920 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 92.9
Parallax 189
100% 135 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 127
Splatting 133
98% 118 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 99.5%
 Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 212 280 234 215 295 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 152
Write 95.3
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 254
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 27.3
97% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 49.4
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 61.1%
 Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
575GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 178 175 177 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 177
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 86.6%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 32.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 22.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 97.4%
 Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,442x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples283x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples235x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples234x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples202x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples190x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples179x
RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples204x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples143x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples134x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback