Asus X555LJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X555LJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LJ
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 45.9
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 171
56% 103 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 250
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Asus(1043 1A6D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 8.25
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 7.39
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 371 352 308 363 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 376
Write 369
Mixed 281
SusWrite 346
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 15.1
72% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 69.5
110% 209 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LJ Builds (Compare 1,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback