Mousecomputer/7hpr64 H81M-D3V-JP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMousecomputer/7hpr64 H81M-D3V-JP  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer H81M-D3V-JP
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 13:23
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 172
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 332
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.78
3% 5.77 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 7.65
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 63.2
57% 66.9 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 52.3
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN-25SATAC3-120 120GB
12GB free
Firmware: Q0707A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 263
Mixed 218
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 12.8
84% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 76.1
101% 180 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 84 82 74 95 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 103
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 78.2
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 88%
BUFFALO Portable HDD 1TB
820GB free, PID 02c2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 78 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 135
Write 108
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 77.5
125% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
170% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-D3V-JP Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Mousecomputer/7hpr64 H81M-D3V-JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback