Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 12:48
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 462
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 40.8
38% 44.7 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 37.3
32% 40 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 203 209 204 205 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.8% Above average
Read 214
Write 202
Mixed 159
SusWrite 201
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 28.3
95% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 38
34% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 116%
H/W DISK 4 1TB
880GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 21 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 21.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 22.4
30% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 47%
H/W DISK 1 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Read 25.9
Write 22.8
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 0.2
23% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 60%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
745GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 20.7
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 0.5
21% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 44%
H/W DISK 2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 23.2
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 2.8
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77-D3H Builds (Compare 1,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback