Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 12:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 733
78% 620 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
MSI(1462 8D91) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.4% Good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 73.8
74% 83.1 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 75.7
61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 403 414 407 409 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 468
Write 396
Mixed 380
SusWrite 408
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 21.1
93% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 33.6
84% 169 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 82%
Great: 92%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
8GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.6 9.6 11 8.4 9.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 129
Write 41.8
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 10.2
66% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
99% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-019.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback