MSI B150M PRO-VD (MS-7996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI B150M PRO-VD (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161215
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '17 at 09:47
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 665
69% 554 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
345GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 400
Mixed 415
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 50
188% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 132
151% 261 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Toshiba Q300 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 493
Write 252
Mixed 271
74% 339 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 7.47
84% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 35.2
82% 177 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
338GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 101
Mixed 90.7
70% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.67
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 24.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M PRO-VD (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B150M PRO-VD (MS-7996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback