bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 19:41
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 297
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 37.9
35% 41.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 35.1
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 253
Mixed 258
70% 320 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 30.6
112% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 239
197% 286 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
198GB free
Firmware: CC41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 31.3
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
55GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,421
Write 17.5
Mixed 24.1
772% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 387
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2
1,533% 130 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 76%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
39GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,521
Write 6
Mixed 16.2
784% 1,181 MB/s
4K Read 394
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
1,535% 132 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback