Acer Aspire E1-531

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E1-531  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_HR
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B960
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 35.7
36% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 72
12% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 97.5
6% 97.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0649) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.15 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 200 203 138 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 430
Write 351
Mixed 305
SusWrite 194
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 15.5
62% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 1.3
41% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 100%
WDC WD80 0BEVS-75RST0 80GB
40GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 27
Write 16.3
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 24.7
29% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4.3
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-531 Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-531

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback