Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive0.45% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 15:32
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 206
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 522
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
0% 14 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 20
Splatting 0.04
12% 16.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.1 3.9 3.4 5 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
0.45% Terrible
Read 2.7
Write 3
Mixed 10
SusWrite 3.9
1% 4.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 56%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
250GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 79 79 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 44
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 78.2
75% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback