Biostar Hi-Fi B85W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi B85W  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141128
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 15:27
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 98
2-Core 192
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 366
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 77.9
54% 69.9 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 54.1
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As340 120GB 120GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 52 53 53 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 494
Write 340
Mixed 200
SusWrite 66.5
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 12
84% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 23.6
73% 153 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190
141GB free
Firmware: A3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 122 123 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 92.5
Write 97.9
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 121
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
10GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 4.9 5 4.8 5 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.83% Terrible
Read 35.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 5.3
14% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.83%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown.B100G.C360C Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT425U6AFR6C-PB Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi B85W Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi B85W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $626
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback