Zyrex Sky 360

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZyrex Sky 360  (all builds)
MotherboardTo To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 08:23
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 41.6
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 97.5
36% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 97.2
8-Core 97.8
13% 97.5 Pts
64-Core 96.6
6% 96.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMI L06B B0KB 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 66 48 32 29 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 374
Write 338
Mixed 283
SusWrite 87.6
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 8.2
58% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.3
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 20
50% 101 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback