Insyde TigerLake

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemInsyde TigerLake  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory16.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 02:41
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 6.3
2-Core 293
59% 124 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 815
83% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Compal(14C0 0139) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 10.6
9% 11.3 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 0.04
6% 8.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 162 161 163 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,771
Write 792
Mixed 680
SusWrite 178
187% 855 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 72.3
260% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 604
459% 604 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 189%
Great: 234%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
11GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 22 21 19 22 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 67.3
Write 22.9
Mixed 11
SusWrite 18.8
32% 30 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS2G64AZ-3G2B1 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 20GB
3200, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 15.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 2.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TigerLake Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 74%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Insyde TigerLake

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback