Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UF
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 21:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 515
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1A1E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 11
10% 11 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 14
Splatting 9.04
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 93 117 104 116 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FN 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 17.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback