Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121212
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 14:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 192
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 469
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 75.6
48% 66.4 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 54
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$33
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0123A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 1.9 71 9.4 102 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 374
Write 318
Mixed 254
SusWrite 66.3
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 11.5
76% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 13.8
24% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 93%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
806GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 159 161 160 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 144
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 159
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 96%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback