Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LK R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 05:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 91.9
45% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 91.9
8-Core 92.4
12% 92.2 Pts
64-Core 92.6
6% 92.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 14.8
14% 15.5 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 17.6
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 100 107 102 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 101
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback